Planning Worth for Yourself and Environment – Preferring Water for Gas
Automobile, Environment May 31st, 2008
Every passing day on this planet Earth is playing its part in addressing some alarming issues lifting their heads. Gas prices and pollution caused by vehicles are roots of the same tree and thus, human race is in constant research to restrict their growth. In order to devise a technology to tame the ill-effects of these problems, we need to address these problems:
- Gas prices are elevating at a fast pace, making it impossible for all to maintain a vehicle.
- The emission from vehicles is the serious contributor towards air pollution, which is further introducing threats to the environment.
- The fuels like petrol and diesel are being used up at alarming rate, leading to the possibility of their scarcity in near future.
- The usage of these fuels tends to decrease the efficiency of engines installed in the vehicles, which limits the capable working of these machines.
What is the Requirement at the Moment
Taking into account the threats appearing in the scene, there is a serious requirement of formulating certain alternatives, which may provide a solution for eradicating these threats. Thus, we need a platform, which may bring in following advantages:
- Provide a cheap alternative to existing fuels and act as a boon to the economy of a country.
- Restrict the level of pollution by not involving in the process of emission of harmful gases to the environment.
- Available in abundance, so that there is no possibility of its scarcity for the coming generations.
- And above all, improves the performance of vehicles, so that these vehicles may serve man for long time.
A proposed alternative, which is capable of proving its potential on all these parameters, is usage of water in the place of gas. In fact, there are online guides like Water 4 Gas, which have already taken big leaps in this direction. This system is found to work efficiently in different types of vehicles and is welcomed with open hands in different regions of the world.
Adapting New Alternatives to Existing Vehicles
The existing vehicles are habitual of employing fuels like gas, petrol and diesel for their engines to make a move. Thus, it is a significant question that whether, new alternatives are capable of getting attuned with these engines or not. The good news is that new systems have already proved their essence in accompanying the engines integrated in different vehicles.
For instance, water as an alternative for gas has been tested to be the undisputed fuel for a vehicle and its engine in the following ways:
- There is no need of installing special setups around the engine to accommodate these newly devised energy sources.
- There is absolutely no need to modify the design of engines, which are already spaced inside different vehicles.
- Water is a well-accepted coolant for engines of these vehicles and thus, there is already a known association between them.
- Water is capable of keeping the engine free from the damage caused by carbon, which was otherwise deposited as a byproduct of existing fuels over engines.
- The devices fabricated to work on the principle of water as a fuel don’t require external sources of electricity to work, as the engine is capable of accomplishing the task.
Thus, there is no scope of uncertainty that these alternatives deserve a deliberation from the vehicle owners. In this direction Water 4 Gas has gained immense popularity amongst these people. This set of useful guides has enhanced the thought process of vehicle owners to not only improve their engine’s efficiency, but also to play their social role in keeping the environment clean.
Future of Alternative Fuel Devices
The devices, which are capable of replacing gas with water, are all set to rule the world due to all good reasons. The goodness about these devices is that these are easy to install and don’t require any special knowledge. Moreover, these systems, utilizing water as energy provider, are least expensive as compared to other systems devised in the recent times. You might come across negative reviews of these products. But, are these reviews worth taking into account? Well! It could be the game strategy of oil companies, which are prone to all time losses with the popularity of these devices. Whatsoever! The possibilities of these devices emerging as powerful entities could not be overruled.
Having said all, we can see that with the usage of these alternative systems, there is a bright future ahead. The time will come, when every vehicle will be bestowed upon with devices developed with the help of guides like Water 4 Gas. It is nice to take the advantage of this writing in strongly recommending this product to vehicle owners across the globe. You can yourself experience the difference with the implementation of ideas published in these guides.
June 1st, 2008 at 2:31 am
Yeah…. sorry but water doesn’t burn.
Water is in its lowest energy state already, it is a rather stable molecule.
So in your device, water is inputted, then water is outputted? see a problem here? where does the energy come from?
Hydrogen extracted from water requires energy (in the form of electricity) to be broken away from the oxygen. This hydrogen can then be burned or passed through a fuel cell. Burning the hydrogen will give a maximum efficiency of about 20% (5joules of energy put in for every 1 joule of energy put out), this is just because of the way internal combustion engines are, they have a 20% or so maximum efficiency. Fuel cells are impractical because they require platinum as a catalyst, and estimates show that there isn’t enough platinum in the world to create fuel cells for cars.
You want to stop polluting the environment with CO2? 1. Start building nuclear plants, alot of them. The nuclear “waste” that comes out of most nuclear plants can be easily reprocessed to be used in another type of reactor (CANDU, among others). They don’t do this because it creates plutonium, which can then be extracted and used in bombs. There is a MASSIVE amount of energy wasted when we don’t reprocess this fuel. Don’t think nuclear is safe? when is the last time you heard of a nuclear plant causing damage? Three mile island was the last and only commercial American nuclear plant disaster, and then it released 0 excess radiation, and we have come a looonnngg way since then in terms of reactor design. A pebble bed nuclear reactor physically cannot melt down, as the reaction increases the temperature in the reactor the reaction slows down, until it hits a maximum which is below meltdown point. worried of radiation released by a plant? a coal power plant releases more radiation because of impurities in the coal being burned and put up into the atmosphere, in addition to mercury, lead, sulfuric acid, etc.
2. Forget corn ethanol, it is useless and just driving up corn prices. Instead start working on fuel from algae, it has many, many advantages over corn. It requires no fertilizer, can be grown in salt water on desert land that otherwise has no use. It grows year round, especially in the desert. It can easily provide 40 to 1 energy output to input verses corn’s 1.6 to 1.
Of course once we get sustainable fusion going, all of this will be obsolete. But that will take a while.
June 1st, 2008 at 12:46 pm
they’ve already made an HHo burning machine, a guy uses it as a welding torch and in his car, also, do you know what the half-life is for nuclear material, just because you can reuse it doesnt fix the fact that it will take 4 billion years to reach halflife
June 1st, 2008 at 1:34 pm
uhh i’m pretty sure they’re talking about using water instead of expanding gas to move the pistons, not trying to burn it.
June 1st, 2008 at 1:41 pm
1) you have way too much time on your hands, get a job / girlfriend…whatever
2) The energy comes from petrol or diesel and electricity, the engine wont run on water alone.
The water is not burnt as water. Electrolysis is used to split the hydrogen and oxygen from each other to form Brown’s gas (HHO). This is highly volatile and will burn when ignited. To see it working have a look on Youtube.
Algae sounds cool, it would take a lot of CO2 out of the atmosphere too.
Regards,
June 1st, 2008 at 5:04 pm
Aren’t we already worried about a shortage of water in the world. So using it as a source of fuel for cars doesn’t seem like the best idea
June 1st, 2008 at 5:28 pm
Hey don’t knock it, the oil companies have been on a mis-information plot for years. This stuff does work, along many of the other inventions of the past. Admitting that cars can get better gas mileage is the same as the government admitting how much the know about aliens!
I help out quite a bit on the forum on this site, and I have studied many alternative fuel ideas for years. This is great stuff, and it would be worthwhile to do some research on your own before coming to hasty conclusions.
June 1st, 2008 at 6:08 pm
Why would you choose water as a fuel? Water is going to be a huge issue because the world is running out of fresh water.
June 1st, 2008 at 6:56 pm
eh retard it takes electricity to burn petrol and to start a diesel engine
June 1st, 2008 at 7:11 pm
I am searching for anyone who has ACTUALLY used or is currently using this alternative fuel source.
Anyone out there that has this on their car/
Curious to know more.
June 1st, 2008 at 7:20 pm
Even if they’re not talking about running exclusively on water, any transition you make from water to gas and back again is inherently going to take more energy than you get out of it, and thus won’t do anything to improve the operation of the engines. (BTW, from their description, they are talking about burning water as fuel. Using water as an expansion gas to use waste heat has been proposed, but that’s not what this article is about).
By the way, your comments about nuclear power are sharp, but incomplete. You can’t do anything “easily” when it comes to fissile material. Waste can be reprocess, but it involves running highly radioactive materials through a chemical plant, where even a small problem can have huge consequences (at least two people have died so far in these kinds of accidents, and the resulting spills are very hard to deal with). Plus, there’s always waste that can’t be reused, and this stuff lasts basically forever. There’s just no good way to deal with something that potent.
On another note, three different solar companies have recently announced plans to mass produce solar cells for less that $1/watt. If that pans out, it will lead to solar power cheaper than coal, which would solve the energy crisis for the forseeable future.
June 1st, 2008 at 7:21 pm
and guess wat i just found out they already made an engine that runs on water its called a steam engine apparently the use it on trains and boats
June 1st, 2008 at 7:59 pm
I find these sites very interesting. Not because of the topic of the site, but the commenters. Okay, LazyBoy scientists, answer this question…
Since you have the answers to this, and I’m sure many more truths, then why have YOU not created a new alternative to the increasing demand on energy?
I have heard many people say that it is neither possible, nor plausible to use water as an alternate fuel for an internal combustion engine. If the is true, then why is there already a Ford Taurus Wagon that utilizes this technology? If you are so sure about the use of other alternatives that will produce better results, then why are there no articles in the paper or on the news to show that you have created the greatest invention the world has seen since sliced bread? Where is your Pulitzer Prize?
Thought so. Shut up.
June 1st, 2008 at 10:21 pm
The government won’t fund the idea because they would lose money if it worked. I could get into it, but then I’d remind everybody about how messed up the government is.
June 2nd, 2008 at 1:49 am
Yea, so you guys are way off. I’ve seen links before on how to make this device and there isn’t much to it. It’s simply a matter of using the electricity that the car makes to separate it into gas. The gas (o2 and H2) is sucked into the engine’s carbeurator and improves economy because both help the burning gasoline. When water runs out, your car works as normal. I don’t know how much they are selling it for, but it can be made for under 50 bucks. The problem is it’s inconvenient to fill it with water everytime you want to drive, and the electrodes corrode really fast (in the tank) so you have to replace them every few months.
No, it’s not sucking water into the engine or burning water lol. If you want to sound smart, stop trying so hard or nobody will believe you. If you’re curious about this product, do some research on how to make one…it shouldn’t take you too long.
June 2nd, 2008 at 1:50 am
Check out my video on Youtube about this
under
trueblueaustralian
under free fuel
June 2nd, 2008 at 2:26 am
The hydrogen that is available for fueling station is made by splitting it from hydrocarbons, which is currently still cheaper than the cost for the electricity to split hydrogen from water(for a while). So guess what, when you use a hydrogen drivenm vehicle, you are using oil!
June 2nd, 2008 at 6:52 am
nuclear plants are the answer…. we need more throw them up everywhere and develop batteries.. wind is pointless, same goes w/ corn… we have nuclear power now, we need to start using it on a large scale and switch out transportation to electricity.
June 2nd, 2008 at 3:14 pm
that’s pretty nifty.