Comments on: Planning Worth for Yourself and Environment – Preferring Water for Gas http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/ Offering Interesting and Informative News, Articles and Facts Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:36:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Jenny http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-124 Jenny Mon, 02 Jun 2008 22:14:40 +0000 http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/#comment-124 that's pretty nifty. that’s pretty nifty.

]]> By: Adam http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-123 Adam Mon, 02 Jun 2008 13:52:50 +0000 http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/#comment-123 nuclear plants are the answer.... we need more throw them up everywhere and develop batteries.. wind is pointless, same goes w/ corn... we have nuclear power now, we need to start using it on a large scale and switch out transportation to electricity. nuclear plants are the answer…. we need more throw them up everywhere and develop batteries.. wind is pointless, same goes w/ corn… we have nuclear power now, we need to start using it on a large scale and switch out transportation to electricity.

]]> By: Berhart http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-122 Berhart Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:26:10 +0000 http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/#comment-122 The hydrogen that is available for fueling station is made by splitting it from hydrocarbons, which is currently still cheaper than the cost for the electricity to split hydrogen from water(for a while). So guess what, when you use a hydrogen drivenm vehicle, you are using oil! The hydrogen that is available for fueling station is made by splitting it from hydrocarbons, which is currently still cheaper than the cost for the electricity to split hydrogen from water(for a while). So guess what, when you use a hydrogen drivenm vehicle, you are using oil!

]]> By: TrueBlueAustralian http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-121 TrueBlueAustralian Mon, 02 Jun 2008 08:50:39 +0000 http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/#comment-121 Check out my video on Youtube about this under trueblueaustralian under free fuel Check out my video on Youtube about this
under
trueblueaustralian
under free fuel

]]> By: Marc http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-120 Marc Mon, 02 Jun 2008 08:49:16 +0000 http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/#comment-120 Yea, so you guys are way off. I've seen links before on how to make this device and there isn't much to it. It's simply a matter of using the electricity that the car makes to separate it into gas. The gas (o2 and H2) is sucked into the engine's carbeurator and improves economy because both help the burning gasoline. When water runs out, your car works as normal. I don't know how much they are selling it for, but it can be made for under 50 bucks. The problem is it's inconvenient to fill it with water everytime you want to drive, and the electrodes corrode really fast (in the tank) so you have to replace them every few months. No, it's not sucking water into the engine or burning water lol. If you want to sound smart, stop trying so hard or nobody will believe you. If you're curious about this product, do some research on how to make one...it shouldn't take you too long. Yea, so you guys are way off. I’ve seen links before on how to make this device and there isn’t much to it. It’s simply a matter of using the electricity that the car makes to separate it into gas. The gas (o2 and H2) is sucked into the engine’s carbeurator and improves economy because both help the burning gasoline. When water runs out, your car works as normal. I don’t know how much they are selling it for, but it can be made for under 50 bucks. The problem is it’s inconvenient to fill it with water everytime you want to drive, and the electrodes corrode really fast (in the tank) so you have to replace them every few months.
No, it’s not sucking water into the engine or burning water lol. If you want to sound smart, stop trying so hard or nobody will believe you. If you’re curious about this product, do some research on how to make one…it shouldn’t take you too long.

]]> By: Greg http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-119 Greg Mon, 02 Jun 2008 05:21:24 +0000 http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/#comment-119 The government won't fund the idea because they would lose money if it worked. I could get into it, but then I'd remind everybody about how messed up the government is. The government won’t fund the idea because they would lose money if it worked. I could get into it, but then I’d remind everybody about how messed up the government is.

]]> By: Tom http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-118 Tom Mon, 02 Jun 2008 02:59:47 +0000 http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/#comment-118 I find these sites very interesting. Not because of the topic of the site, but the commenters. Okay, LazyBoy scientists, answer this question... Since you have the answers to this, and I'm sure many more truths, then why have YOU not created a new alternative to the increasing demand on energy? I have heard many people say that it is neither possible, nor plausible to use water as an alternate fuel for an internal combustion engine. If the is true, then why is there already a Ford Taurus Wagon that utilizes this technology? If you are so sure about the use of other alternatives that will produce better results, then why are there no articles in the paper or on the news to show that you have created the greatest invention the world has seen since sliced bread? Where is your Pulitzer Prize? Thought so. Shut up. I find these sites very interesting. Not because of the topic of the site, but the commenters. Okay, LazyBoy scientists, answer this question…
Since you have the answers to this, and I’m sure many more truths, then why have YOU not created a new alternative to the increasing demand on energy?
I have heard many people say that it is neither possible, nor plausible to use water as an alternate fuel for an internal combustion engine. If the is true, then why is there already a Ford Taurus Wagon that utilizes this technology? If you are so sure about the use of other alternatives that will produce better results, then why are there no articles in the paper or on the news to show that you have created the greatest invention the world has seen since sliced bread? Where is your Pulitzer Prize?
Thought so. Shut up.

]]> By: asdfasdf http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-117 asdfasdf Mon, 02 Jun 2008 02:21:19 +0000 http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/#comment-117 and guess wat i just found out they already made an engine that runs on water its called a steam engine apparently the use it on trains and boats and guess wat i just found out they already made an engine that runs on water its called a steam engine apparently the use it on trains and boats

]]> By: Geoff http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-116 Geoff Mon, 02 Jun 2008 02:20:15 +0000 http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/#comment-116 Even if they're not talking about running exclusively on water, any transition you make from water to gas and back again is inherently going to take more energy than you get out of it, and thus won't do anything to improve the operation of the engines. (BTW, from their description, they are talking about burning water as fuel. Using water as an expansion gas to use waste heat has been proposed, but that's not what this article is about). By the way, your comments about nuclear power are sharp, but incomplete. You can't do anything "easily" when it comes to fissile material. Waste can be reprocess, but it involves running highly radioactive materials through a chemical plant, where even a small problem can have huge consequences (at least two people have died so far in these kinds of accidents, and the resulting spills are very hard to deal with). Plus, there's always waste that can't be reused, and this stuff lasts basically forever. There's just no good way to deal with something that potent. On another note, three different solar companies have recently announced plans to mass produce solar cells for less that $1/watt. If that pans out, it will lead to solar power cheaper than coal, which would solve the energy crisis for the forseeable future. Even if they’re not talking about running exclusively on water, any transition you make from water to gas and back again is inherently going to take more energy than you get out of it, and thus won’t do anything to improve the operation of the engines. (BTW, from their description, they are talking about burning water as fuel. Using water as an expansion gas to use waste heat has been proposed, but that’s not what this article is about).
By the way, your comments about nuclear power are sharp, but incomplete. You can’t do anything “easily” when it comes to fissile material. Waste can be reprocess, but it involves running highly radioactive materials through a chemical plant, where even a small problem can have huge consequences (at least two people have died so far in these kinds of accidents, and the resulting spills are very hard to deal with). Plus, there’s always waste that can’t be reused, and this stuff lasts basically forever. There’s just no good way to deal with something that potent.
On another note, three different solar companies have recently announced plans to mass produce solar cells for less that $1/watt. If that pans out, it will lead to solar power cheaper than coal, which would solve the energy crisis for the forseeable future.

]]> By: Ezelda http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-115 Ezelda Mon, 02 Jun 2008 02:11:15 +0000 http://www.allrandomstuff.com/planning-worth-for-yourself-and-environment-preferring-water-for-gas/#comment-115 I am searching for anyone who has ACTUALLY used or is currently using this alternative fuel source. Anyone out there that has this on their car/ Curious to know more. I am searching for anyone who has ACTUALLY used or is currently using this alternative fuel source.

Anyone out there that has this on their car/

Curious to know more.

]]>